Skip Navigation
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, provide ads, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.

Recent History of Alaska’s Retirement Systems

In recent years, Alaska educators have taken to calling Alaska’s worst in the nation retirement system “the death tier.” Learn how the system became one where many people will outlive their retirement savings and be forced to work until they die.
Published: March 2023

In recent years, Alaska educators have taken to calling Alaska’s worst in the nation retirement system “the death tier”—a grim acknowledgement that even though there is a “retirement” system in place, many people will outlive their retirement savings and will be forced to work until they die. 

The History

In 2006, educators, public employees and many Alaskans warned of the harm that this transition would have on retirement security, retirement costs and expenses, and competitive benefits for recruitment and retention of public employees. However, there was a major national push for privatizing retirements, that included pressure from the White House.  

Alaska’s legislators succumbed to the false promise of savings, which have never been achieved – while shifting all of the risk to individual employees to navigate the stock market and individually manage their retirement security.  

The change to a DC system was particularly damaging to TRS employees, all of whom currently don’t participate in Social Security through their school districts, and some PERS employees who have neither Social Security or SBS (Supplemental Benefit Savings).

A recent analysis by the Chief Investment Officer of the State of Alaska shows that after working a 30 year career, as many as 75% of TRS members could run out of retirement savings after 20 years of retirement – with no Social Security as a safety net.

Follow this link to see the chart comparing TRS 1,2, and 3
Follow this link to see the chart comparing PERS 1,2,3, and 4


Exacerbating the Educator Shortage 

Some employees appreciate the “portability” of the new DC plan. After 5 years, you can take all of your contributions and 100% of the employer contributions and move out of Alaska with no penalty.  

This is problematic for several reasons, but most importantly it gives little to no incentive for educators to spend their entire career and retire in Alaska, and in some cases, actively encourages people to leave after 5 years.  

We know the more experience a teacher has, the better they are at educating students. When we lose educators after 5 years it costs money to recruit new employees who are often earlier in their careers. Recent research documented a 22% turnover rate for Alaska teachers.

Designed to fail 

In addition to the damage done to new hires with no access to a pension, there are no new contributions being made to Alaska’s DB system.  

The plan has been “closed”. As members retire and start to draw their pensions, there are no additional funds contributing to maintain the health of the pension system.

Eventually, this system will run out of money.

The Results

No savings 

To learn more about why closing Alaska’s DB plan has not saved the state money read “Enduring Challenges: Examining the Experience of States that Closed Pension Plans.”

Quote byTyler Bond and Dan Doonan , National Institute on Retirement Security

Closing the plans did not reduce the unfunded liability. Alaska has managed to improve the funded status of both plans modestly . . . but this is due almost entirely to the [one-time] $3 billion contribution. Meanwhile, the unfunded actuarial accrued liability for pension benefits has increased in both plans since 2005.
—Tyler Bond and Dan Doonan , National Institute on Retirement Security

The Bottom Line

The bottom line is that pensions are a better deal for employers and employees. To learn more about why pensions are a better deal for employers and employees read: Still a Better Bang for the Buck: An Update on the Economic Benefits of Defined Benefit Pensions.

Analysis finds that there are three unique drivers of the cost savings.

The drivers of the cost savings from DB pensions

  1. Pool the longevity risks of large numbers of individuals to provide Americans with stable income that won’t run out in retirement. Said another way, pensions only have to save for the average life expectancy of a group of individuals. Absent a group retirement plan, individuals must save enough on their own should they be among the half of retirees who will live longer than the average life expectancy. This DB pension longevity risk pooling feature generates a 10% cost savings.
  2. Are “ageless” and therefore can perpetually maintain an optimally balanced investment portfolio. In contrast, a typical individual investor must down shift investments over time to a lower risk portfolio of cash and bonds, sacrificing higher investment returns generated from stocks. This DB pension balanced portfolio feature generates an 11% cost savings.
  3. Achieve higher investment returns as compared to individual investors because they have lower fees and are managed by investment professionals. This lower fees and higher returns DB pension feature generates a 27% cost savings.

Learn more

A retired member in a school gym.

Defined Benefit Retirement

Our members are the driving force behind changing the current system and restoring a retirement with dignity for all Alaska public employees.
A person stacking blocks of benefits

Pensions for Educators

In preliminary findings from Governor Dunleavy’s Teacher Retention and Recruitment Task Force, retirement was listed as one of the top-three issues for both teachers and administrators.
A retired member speaking at the delegate assembly

How Unions Are Fighting for Retirement Security

Defined benefit pensions offer the greatest security in retirement. That’s why NEA-Alaska and NEA continue to advocate for defined benefit pensions.

Use Your Educator Voice.

We are THE voice for educators in Alaska. See what membership can mean for you!
A photo from the Raise the BSA rally focused on a woman in the crowd of marching members. She is wearing a grey coat, red hat, and red scarf with a smile as she looks to the horizon with a hopeful look in her eyes.  A sign that says "Raise the BSA" is in one of her gloved hands.

Ready to speak up for public schools?

Learn more about the issues and policies that impact public education, then take action to support students.

Reach. Teach. Inspire.

NEA-Alaska advocates for an excellent public education for each child in Alaska and advances the interests of public school employees.